UV to visible-light observations of SN 2018fif Virtual Observatory Resource

Authors
  1. Soumagnac M.T.
  2. Ganot N.
  3. Irani I.
  4. Gal-yam A.
  5. Ofek E.O.
  6. Waxman E.,Morag J.
  7. Yaron O.
  8. Schulze S.
  9. Yang Yi
  10. Rubin A.
  11. Cenko S.B.
  12. Sollerman J.,Perley D.A.
  13. Fremling C.
  14. Nugent P.
  15. Neill J.D.
  16. Karamehmetoglu E.,Bellm E.C.
  17. Bruch R.J.
  18. Burruss R.
  19. Cunningham V.
  20. Dekany R.
  21. Golkhou V.Z.,Graham M.J.
  22. Kasliwal M.M.
  23. Konidaris N.P.
  24. Kulkarni S.R.
  25. Kupfer T.,Laher R.R.
  26. Masci F.J.
  27. Riddle R.
  28. Rigault M.
  29. Rusholme B.
  30. van Roestel J.,Zackay B.
  31. Published by
    CDS
Abstract

High-cadence transient surveys are able to capture supernovae closer to their first light than ever before. Applying analytical models to such early emission, we can constrain the progenitor stars' properties. In this paper, we present observations of SN 2018fif (ZTF18abokyfk). The supernova was discovered close to first light and monitored by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. Early spectroscopic observations suggest that the progenitor of SN 2018fif was surrounded by relatively small amounts of circumstellar material compared to all previous cases. This particularity, coupled with the high-cadence multiple-band coverage, makes it a good candidate to investigate using shock-cooling models. We employ the SOPRANOS code, an implementation of the model by Sapir & Waxman and its extension to early times by Morag et al. Compared with previous implementations, SOPRANOS has the advantage of including a careful account of the limited temporal validity domain of the shock-cooling model as well as allowing usage of the entirety of the early UV data. We find that the progenitor of SN 2018fif was a large red supergiant with a radius of R=744.0_-128.0_^+183.0^R_{sun}_ and an ejected mass of M_ej_=9.3_-5.8_^+0.4^M_{sun}_. Our model also gives information on the explosion epoch, the progenitor's inner structure, the shock velocity, and the extinction. The distribution of radii is double- peaked, with smaller radii corresponding to lower values of the extinction, earlier recombination times, and a better match to the early UV data. If these correlations persist in future objects, denser spectroscopic monitoring constraining the time of recombination, as well as accurate UV observations (e.g., with ULTRASAT), will help break the extinction/radius degeneracy and independently determine both.

Keywords
  1. ultraviolet-photometry
  2. infrared-photometry
  3. visible-astronomy
  4. Wide-band photometry
  5. supernovae
  6. absolute-magnitude
Bibliographic source Bibcode
2020ApJ...902....6S
See also HTML
https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/ApJ/902/6
IVOA Identifier IVOID
ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/ApJ/902/6
Document Object Identifer DOI
doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.19020006

Access

Web browser access HTML
http://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/902/6
https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/902/6
http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/902/6
IVOA Table Access TAP
http://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tap
Run SQL-like queries with TAP-enabled clients (e.g., TOPCAT).

History

2022-02-23T13:20:31Z
Resource record created
2022-02-23T13:20:31Z
Created
2022-05-18T13:10:38Z
Updated

Contact

Name
CDS support team
Postal Address
CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
E-Mail
cds-question@unistra.fr