J/MNRAS/437/656ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/MNRAS/437/656doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.74370656CDSMcCrum M.Smartt S.J.Kotak R.Rest A.Jerkstrand A.Inserra C.,Rodney S.A.Chen T.-W.Howell D.A.Huber M.E.Pastorello A.,Tonry J.L.Bresolin F.Kudritzki R.-P.Chornock R.Berger E.Smith K.,Botticella M.T.Foley R.J.Fraser M.Milisavljevic D.Nicholl M.,Riess A.G.Stubbs C.W.Valenti S.Wood-Vasey W.M.Wright D.,Young D.R.Drout M.Czekala I.Burgett W.S.Chambers K.C.Draper P.,Flewelling H.Hodapp K.W.Kaiser N.Magnier E.A.Metcalfe N.,Price P.A.Sweeney W.Wainscoat R.J.2024-08-07T20:12:47Z2016-04-07T09:01:53ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.frsupernovaevisible-astronomysloan-photometryWe present optical photometric and spectroscopic coverage of the superluminous supernova (SLSN) PS1-11ap, discovered with the Pan-STARRS1 Medium Deep Survey at z=0.524. This intrinsically blue transient rose slowly to reach a peak magnitude of M_u_=-21.4mag and bolometric luminosity of 8x10^43^erg/s before settling on to a relatively shallow gradient of decline. The observed decline is significantly slower than those of the SLSNe-Ic which have been the focus of much recent attention. Spectroscopic similarities with the lower redshift SN2007bi and a decline rate similar to 56Co decay time-scale initially indicated that this transient could be a candidate for a pair instability supernova (PISN) explosion. Overall the transient appears quite similar to SN2007bi and the lower redshift object PTF12dam. The extensive data set, from 30d before peak to 230d after, allows a detailed and quantitative comparison with published models of PISN explosions. We find that the PS1-11ap data do not match these model explosion parameters well, supporting the recent claim that these SNe are not pair instability explosions. We show that PS1-11ap has many features in common with the faster declining SLSNe-Ic, and the light-curve evolution can also be quantitatively explained by the magnetar spin-down model. At a redshift of z=0.524, the observer-frame optical coverage provides comprehensive rest-frame UV data and allows us to compare it with the SLSNe recently found at high redshifts between z=2 and 4. While these high-z explosions are still plausible PISN candidates, they match the photometric evolution of PS1-11ap and hence could be counterparts to this lower redshift transient.2014MNRAS.437..656Mhttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/MNRAS/437/656CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic servicerelated-toJ/ApJ/750/99 : The Pan-STARRS1 photometric system (Tonry+, 2012)https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/MNRAS/437/656GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapOpticaldefaultJ/MNRAS/437/656/tablea1Observed photometry of PS1-11ap, without K-corrections.recnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintObs.dateObservation datetime.epoch;obsnullableMJDModified Julian date of observationdtime.epochdoublee_MJD? rms uncertainty on MJD (1)dstat.error;time.epochfloatnullablePhasePhase (days since explosion)dtime.phasefloate_Phase? rms uncertainty on Phase (1)dstat.error;time.phasefloatnullablel_magLimit flag on magmeta.code.errorcharmagLT magnitude in Filter (2)magphot.magfloate_mag? rms uncertainty on magmagstat.error;phot.magfloatnullableFilt[grizy P1] Filter (3)meta.id;instr.filtercharTel[LT PS1] Telescopemeta.id;instr.telchar