VI/143ivo://CDS.VizieR/VI/143CDSCousin M.Lagache G.Bethermin M.Blaizot J.Guiderdoni B.2017-11-29T11:49:13Z2015-02-19T12:04:17ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.frastronomical-modelsgalaxiescatalogsSemi-analytical models (SAMs) are currently the best way to understand the formation of galaxies within the cosmic dark-matter structures. They are able to give a statistical view of the variety of the evolutionary histories of galaxies in terms of star formation and stellar mass assembly. While they reproduce the local stellar mass functions, correlation functions and luminosity functions fairly well, they fail to match observations at high redshift (z>=3) in most cases, particularly in the low-mass range. The inconsistency between models and observations indicates that the history of gas accretion in galaxies, within their host dark-matter halo, and the transformation of gas into stars, are not followed well. We briefly present a new version of the GalICS semi-analytical model. With this new model, we explore the impact of classical mechanisms, such as supernova feedback or photoionization, on the evolution of the stellar mass assembly and the star formation rate. Even with strong efficiency, these two processes cannot explain the observed stellar mass function and star formation rate distribution or the stellar mass versus dark matter halo mass relation. We thus introduce an ad hoc modification of the standard paradigm, based on the presence of a no-star-forming gas component, and a concentration of the star-forming gas in galaxy discs. The main idea behind the existence of the no-star-forming gas reservoir is that only a fraction of the total gas mass in a galaxy is available to form stars. The reservoir generates a delay between the accretion of the gas and the star formation process. This new model is in much better agreement with the observations of the stellar mass function in the low-mass range than the previous models and agrees quite well with a large set of observations, including the redshift evolution of the specific star formation rate. However, it predicts a large amount of no-star-forming baryonic gas, potentially larger than observed, even if its nature has still to be examined in the context of the missing baryon problem.2015A&A...575A..32Chttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/VI/143CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic servicehttps://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=VI/143https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=VI/143http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=VI/143https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=VI/143https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=VI/143http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=VI/143GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapdefaultVI/143/listList of models FITS filesrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintFileNameName of the FITS file (11 tables) (1)meta.id;meta.fitscharfitsSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlcharSize[3.2] Size of the fileGibytemeta.id;meta.fitsfloatContentsDetails of the tables and columns included in the filemeta.ref.urlcharContentName of the file describing the datameta.id;meta.filecharTitleTitle of the modelmeta.title;stat.param;meta.modelledchar