J/ApJ/905/170ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/ApJ/905/170doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.19050170CDSMosleh M.Hosseinnejad S.Hosseini-ShahiSavandi S.Z.Tacchella S.2022-09-05T13:54:17Z2022-08-08T10:57:31ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.frgalaxiesvisible-astronomygalaxy-classification-systemsredshiftedstellar-massessurveysHow stellar mass assembles within galaxies is still an open question. We present measurements of the stellar mass distribution on kiloparsec-scales for ~5500 galaxies with stellar masses above log(M_*_/M_{sun}_)>=9.8 up to redshift 2.0. We create stellar mass maps from Hubble Space Telescope observations by means of the pixel-by-pixel spectral energy distribution fitting method. These maps are used to derive radii encompassing 20%, 50%, and 80% (r20, r50, and r80) of the total stellar mass from the best-fit Sersic models. The reliability and limitations of the structural parameter measurements are checked extensively using a large sample (~3000) of simulated galaxies. The size-mass relations and redshift evolution of r20, r50, and r80 are explored for star-forming and quiescent galaxies. At fixed mass, the star-forming galaxies do not show significant changes in their r20, r50, and r80 sizes, indicating self-similar growth. Only above the pivot stellar mass of log(M_*_/M_{sun}_)~10.5 does r80 evolve as r80{propto}(1+z)^-0.85+/-0.20^, indicating that mass builds up in the outskirts of these systems (inside-out growth). The Sersic values also increase for the massive star-forming galaxies toward late cosmic time. Massive quiescent galaxies show stronger size evolution at all radii, in particular, the r20 sizes. For these massive galaxies, Sersic values remain almost constant since at least z~1.3, indicating that the strong size evolution is related to the changes in the outer parts of these galaxies. We make all the structural parameters publicly available.2020ApJ...905..170Mhttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/ApJ/905/170CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic serviceIsServedByConesearch servicerelated-toJ/AJ/100/1091 : UBR photometry of 39 elliptical galaxies (Peletier+ 1990)J/ApJ/762/77 : PM2GC mass-limited sample surface phot. (Poggianti+, 2013)J/ApJ/763/73 : Surface density profiles of GOODS-S gal. (Szomoru+, 2013)J/ApJS/214/24 : 3D-HST+CANDELS catalog (Skelton+, 2014)J/ApJ/805/181 : Classification of 1.5<=z<=3 HUDF galaxies (Cibinel+, 2015)J/ApJS/225/27 : 3D-HST Survey: grism spectra master cat. (Momcheva+, 2016)J/MNRAS/476/1765 : MaNGA E and S galaxies properties (Li+, 2018)J/ApJ/872/91 : SHELS galaxy sizes using Subaru/HSC (Damjanov+, 2019)J/A+A/626/A61 : Structural parameters of galaxies (Morselli+, 2019)J/ApJ/877/103 : Half-mass radii for galaxies at 1.0<=z<=2.5 (Suess+, 2019)J/ApJS/244/16 : HLF photometric catalog in GOODS-S v2.0 (Whitaker+, 2019)J/A+A/640/A34 : Red-sequence early-type galaxies in clusters (Andreon, 2020)https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/905/170https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/905/170http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/905/170https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/905/170https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/905/170http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/905/170GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapCone search capability for table J/ApJ/905/170/table6 (Structural properties for 5557 galaxies on CANDELS fields)https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/905/170/table6?https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/905/170/table6?http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/905/170/table6?GETtext/xml+votable180.050000true215.3007753.051240.0055555555555555566/11252 11425 17679 17688 17690 27258 35935https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/moc/J/ApJ/905/170?format=asciiOpticaldefaultJ/ApJ/905/170/table6Structural properties for 5557 galaxies on CANDELS fieldsrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintID[1/50460] Source identification number (1)meta.id;meta.mainintFieldCANDELS field nameobs.fieldcharRAJ2000[34.2/215.31] Right Ascension (J2000) (1)degpos.eq.ra;meta.mainDEJ2000[-27.96/62.4] Declination (J2000) (1)degpos.eq.dec;meta.mainz[0.09/2] Redshift (1)src.redshiftfloatlogM*[9.8/11.54] Log total stellar mass (1)log(solMass)phys.massfloatnMI[0.3/10]? First method best-fit Sersic parameter (2)src.morph.param;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_nMI[0.1/1.5]? Uncertainty in nMIstat.errorfloatnullabler50MI[0.03/15.3]? First method best-fit half-mass, r_50_, parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullableSimbadSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlchare_r50MI[0.01/7.3]? Uncertainty in r50MIkpcstat.errorfloatnullabler20MI[0.004/8.83]? First method best-fit r_20_ parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_r20MI[0.003/4.3]? Uncertainty in r20MIkpcstat.errorfloatnullabler80MI[0.05/112]? First method best-fit r_80_ parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_r80MI[0.05/22]? Uncertainty in r80MIkpcstat.errorfloatnullablefMI[0/1] Quality flag for first method (0=reliable method result; 1=bad)meta.code.qualintnMII[0.1/12]? Second method best-fit Sersic parametersrc.morph.param;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_nMII[0/6775]? Uncertainty in nMIIstat.errordoublenullableq[0.1/1]? Second method best-fit q parameterstat.param;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_q[0/1565818]? Uncertainty in qstat.errordoublenullabler50MII[0.002/53.1]? Second method best-fit half-mass, r_50_, parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_r50MII[0/600]? Uncertainty in r50MIIkpcstat.errorfloatnullabler20MII[0/8.86]? Second method best-fit r_20_ parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_r20MII[0/283]? Uncertainty in r20MIIkpcstat.errorfloatnullabler80MII[0.003/407.3]? Second method best-fit r_80_ parameterkpcphys.size.radius;meta.modelledfloatnullablee_r80MII[0/4015]? Uncertainty in r80MIIkpcstat.errordoublenullablefMII[0/1] Quality flag for second method (0=reliable method result; 1=bad)meta.code.qualint