J/ApJ/870/123ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/ApJ/870/123doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.18700123CDSEdelson R.Gelbord J.Cackett E.Peterson B.M.Horne K.Barth A.J.,Starkey D.A.Bentz M.Brandt W.N.Goad M.Joner M.Korista K.,Netzer H.Page K.Uttley P.Vaughan S.Breeveld A.Cenko S.B.,Done C.Evans P.Fausnaugh M.Ferland G.Gonzalez-Buitrago D.,Gropp J.Grupe D.Kaastra J.Kennea J.Kriss G.Mathur S.,Mehdipour M.Mudd D.Nousek J.Schmidt T.Vestergaard M.Villforth C.2020-04-20T13:40:14Z2020-03-04T08:14:31ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.fractive-galactic-nucleiseyfert-galaxiesvisible-astronomybroad-band-photometryultraviolet-photometryx-ray-sourcesSwift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded light curves sampled ~200-350 times in 0.3-10keV X-ray and six UV/optical bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these data sets yields three main results: (1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and power those in the surrounding accretion disk. (2) The UV/optical interband lags are generally consistent with {tau}{propto}{lambda}^4/3^ as predicted by the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties involved. (3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a factor of ~2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and fits. This excess appears to be due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences between the uncertainties derived by Just Another Vehicle for Estimating Lags In Nuclei (JAVELIN) versus more standard lag measurement techniques, with JAVELIN reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the analyses reported herein.2019ApJ...870..123Ehttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/ApJ/870/123CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic serviceIsServedByConesearch servicerelated-toJ/ApJ/613/682 : AGN central masses & broad-line region sizes (Peterson+, 2004)J/ApJ/622/129 : Lag-luminosity relationship in AGN (Sergeev+, 2005)J/ApJ/681/113 : Swift BAT survey of AGNs (Tueller+, 2008)J/ApJ/698/895 : Variations in QSOs optical flux (Kelly+, 2009)J/MNRAS/397/1177 : Swift-XRT observations of GRBs (Evans+, 2009)J/ApJ/753/L2 : Reverberation mapping of AGNs (Assef+, 2012)J/ApJ/755/60 : Reverberation mapping for 5 Seyfert 1 galaxies (Grier+, 2012)J/ApJ/788/48 : X-ray through NIR photometry of NGC 2617 (Shappee+, 2014)J/ApJ/795/149 : Reverberation mapping of Seyfert 1 NGC 7469 (Peterson+, 2014)J/ApJ/801/45 : QSOs properties & reverberation mapping (Hernitschek+, 2015)J/ApJ/806/129 : Space telescope RM project. II. Swift data (Edelson+, 2015)J/ApJ/821/56 : Space telescope RM project. III. NGC5548 LCs (Fausnaugh+, 2016)J/ApJ/827/118 : A new reverberation mapping campaign on NGC 5548 (Lu+, 2016)J/ApJ/840/41 : X-ray/UV Swift monitoring of NGC 4151 (Edelson+, 2017)J/ApJ/840/97 : Reverberation mapping campaign of 5 AGNs (Fausnaugh+, 2017)https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/870/123https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/870/123http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/870/123https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/870/123https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/870/123http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/870/123GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapCone search capability for table J/ApJ/870/123/table1 (Intensive disk reverberation mapping (IDRM) AGN source and campaign parameters)https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/870/123/table1?https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/870/123/table1?http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/870/123/table1?GETtext/xml+votable180.050000true311.0406267-10.72353470.0055555555555555566/8922 10912 26148 49042https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/moc/J/ApJ/870/123?format=asciiX-rayUVOpticaldefaultJ/ApJ/870/123/table1Intensive disk reverberation mapping (IDRM) AGN source and campaign parametersrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintNpNumber of flux measurements for this AGN (link to Table 2)meta.numberintnullableNameName of the observed objectmeta.id;meta.maincharprimaryz[0.003/0.04] Redshift from SIMBAD databasesrc.redshiftfloatlogBHM[6.8/8.1] Black hole mass from the AGN black hole mass database (log_10_(M_BH_/M_{sun}_) (1)log(solMass)phys.massfloatfEdd[1/8] Eddington ratio (dm/dt_Edd_=L_bol_/L_Edd_)%phys.luminosity;arith.ratiointMJD1[56706/57830] Modified Julian Date at the beginning of the campaign (JD-2400000.5)dtime.epochfloatMJD2[56833/58103] Modified Julian Date at the end of the campaign (JD-2400000.5)dtime.epochfloatDur[22/273] Campaign durationdtime.durationfloatN[194/322] Total number of visits in which usable data were gathered in at least one bandmeta.numberintSamp[0.1/1.1] Mean sampling interval based on the campaign duration and the number of visitsdtime.interval;stat.meanfloatLCxInteractive Plotmeta.ref.urlcharLCoInteractive Plotmeta.ref.urlcharSimbadSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlcharNEDNED column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlcharLEDAmeta.ref.urlchar_RARight Ascension (J2000) from SIMBAD (not part of the original data)degpos.eq.ra;meta.main_DEDeclination (J2000) from SIMBAD (not part of the original data)degpos.eq.dec;meta.mainJ/ApJ/870/123/table2Swift-UVOT and Swift-XRT fluxesExp[23/1673] Duration of exposure in filterstime.duration;obs.exposuredoublerecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintNameObject Namemeta.id;meta.maincharFiltFilter/band used for Flux (Swift/UVOT: U,B,V,W1,W2,M2 or Swift/XRT: HX (1.5-10keV) or SX (0.3-1.5keV))instr.setupcharCNum[1001/4194] Cadence number (1)meta.id;obsintMJD[56705/58102.5] Modified Julian Date at the midpoint of the exposure (JD-2400000.5)dtime.epochdoubleFuvot[0.8/6.9]? Mean Swift/UVOT flux in units of 10^-14^erg/cm^2^/s/{AA}1e-16W.m**-2.nm**-1phot.flux.densityfloatnullablee_Fuvot[0.01/0.7]? Uncertainty in Fuvot1e-16W.m**-2.nm**-1stat.errorfloatnullableFX[0.05/2.6]? Mean Swift/XRT fluxct/sphot.flux;em.X-rayfloatnullablee_FX[0.01/0.2]? Uncertainty in FXct/sstat.errorfloatnullableJ/ApJ/870/123/table8UV mask boxesrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintMask[1/64] UV mask box numbermeta.id;instrintX1[317/729] X pixel range, start (G1)pixpos.cartesian.xintX2[326/736] X pixel range, end (G1)pixpos.cartesian.xintY1[265/671] Y pixel range, start (G1)pixpos.cartesian.yintY2[269/692] Y pixel range, end (G1)pixpos.cartesian.yintJ/ApJ/870/123/table9Optical mask boxesrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintMask[1/11] Optical mask box numbermeta.id;instrintX1[359/5361] X pixel range, start (G1)pixpos.cartesian.xintX2[377/577] X pixel range, end (G1)pixpos.cartesian.xintY1[439/650] Y pixel range, start (G1)pixpos.cartesian.yintY2[447/657] Y pixel range, end (G1)pixpos.cartesian.yint