J/ApJ/801/44ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/ApJ/801/44doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.18010044CDSZitrin A.Fabris A.Merten J.Melchior P.Meneghetti M.Koekemoer A.,Coe D.Maturi M.Bartelmann M.Postman M.Umetsu K.Seidel G.,Sendra I.Broadhurst T.Balestra I.Biviano A.Grillo C.Mercurio A.,Nonino M.Rosati P.Bradley L.Carrasco M.Donahue M.Ford H.,Frye B.L.Moustakas J.2017-09-29T09:02:30Z2015-07-29T12:39:43ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.frgalaxy-clustersgravitational-lensingx-ray-sourcesredshiftedastronomical-modelsWe present results from a comprehensive lensing analysis in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data of the complete Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble cluster sample (CLASH). We identify previously undiscovered multiple images, allowing improved or first constraints on the cluster inner mass distributions and profiles. We combine these strong lensing constraints with weak lensing shape measurements within the HST field of view (FOV) to jointly constrain the mass distributions. The analysis is performed in two different common parameterizations (one adopts light-traces-mass (LTM) for both galaxies and dark matter while the other adopts an analytical, elliptical Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) form for the dark matter) to provide a better assessment of the underlying systematics--which is most important for deep, cluster-lensing surveys, especially when studying magnified high-redshift objects. We find that the typical (median), relative systematic differences throughout the central FOV are ~40% in the (dimensionless) mass density, {kappa}, and ~20% in the magnification, {mu}. We show maps of these differences for each cluster, as well as the mass distributions, critical curves, and two-dimensional (2D)-integrated mass profiles. For the Einstein radii (z_s_=2) we find that all typically agree within 10% between the two models, and Einstein masses agree, typically, within ~15%. At larger radii, the total projected, 2D-integrated mass profiles of the two models, within r~2', differ by ~30%. Stacking the surface-density profiles of the sample from the two methods together, we obtain an average slope of dlog({Sigma})/dlog(r)~-0.64+/-0.1, in the radial range [5350]kpc. Last, we also characterize the behavior of the average magnification, surface density, and shear differences between the two models as a function of both the radius from the center and the best-fit values of these quantities.2015ApJ...801...44Zhttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/ApJ/801/44CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic serviceIsServedByConesearch servicerelated-toB/hst : HST Archived Exposures Catalog (STScI, 2007)VII/110 : Rich Clusters of Galaxies (Abell+ 1989)J/ApJ/800/18 : HST/WFC3 obs. of z~7-8 galaxies in A2744 (Atek+, 2015)J/A+A/579/A4 : MCS J1206.2-0847 gal. spectral classif. (Girardi+, 2015)J/MNRAS/443/1549 : MACSJ0416.1-2403 strong-lensing analysis (Jauzac+, 2014)J/A+A/562/A86 : CLASH. Photometric + photo-z catalog (Jouvel+, 2014)J/MNRAS/437/1858 : Galaxies in the RX J1347.5-1145 cluster (Kohlinger+, 2014)J/ApJ/762/L30 : CLASH: MCS J0416.1-2403 lensing analysis (Zitrin+, 2013)J/ApJ/757/22 : Strong and weak lensing analysis of A2261 (Coe+, 2012)J/ApJS/199/25 : CLASH sources for MACS1149.6+2223 (Postman+, 2012)J/ApJ/749/97 : Multiple lensed images in MCS J1206.2-0847 (Zitrin+, 2012)J/ApJ/723/1678 : LensPerfect A1689 analysis (Coe+, 2010)J/MNRAS/404/325 : Massive galaxy clusters lensing analyse (Richard+, 2010)J/MNRAS/395/1213 : galaxies in the field of MACS J1206.2-0847 (Ebeling+, 2009)J/ApJS/174/117 : Properties and metal abundances of clusters (Maughan+, 2008)J/ApJ/668/643 : Multiply imaged gravitational lens systems (Limousin+, 2007)J/AJ/132/926 : Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (Coe+, 2006)J/ApJ/621/53 : Multiple arc systems in A1689 (Broadhurst+, 2005)http://www.stsci.edu/hst/campaigns/frontier-fields/ : HST frontier fieldshttp://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/clash/ : CLASH home page on MASThttps://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/801/44https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/801/44http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/ApJ/801/44https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/801/44https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/801/44http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/ApJ/801/44GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapCone search capability for table J/ApJ/801/44/table2 (Multiple images and candidates)https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/table2?https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/table2?http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/table2?GETtext/xml+votable180.050000true22.96644611-13.611836110.005555555555555556Cone search capability for table J/ApJ/801/44/clusters (CLASH cluster sample properties from Postman et al., 2012, J/ApJS/199/25, tables 3 and 4)https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/clusters?https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/clusters?http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/conesearch/J/ApJ/801/44/clusters?GETtext/xml+votable180.050000true22.9690417-13.61077780.0055555555555555566/6383 6441 6539 7904 8921 9052 9476 9498 17457 19097 22771 23173 25451 25675 26177 27075 28448 28535 28622 34793 36846 46474 46496 48076 48423 49012https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/moc/J/ApJ/801/44?format=asciiX-rayOpticaldefaultJ/ApJ/801/44/table2Multiple images and candidatesSimbadNameSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.idcharrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintIDCluster abbreviated namemeta.idcharArcArc identifier (1)meta.id;meta.maincharRAJ2000Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)degpos.eq.ra;meta.mainDEJ2000Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)degpos.eq.dec;meta.mainzph[0.02/7.7]? Photometric redshift (2)stat.paramfloatnullableb_zph? Lower 95% confidence limit for zphstat.fit.paramfloatnullableB_zph? Upper 95% confidence limit for zphstat.fit.paramfloatnullablez.in[-6.1/7.2]? Adopted input redshift (3)stat.paramfloatnullablezLTM[0.7/4.7]? Predicted LTM model redshiftstat.paramfloatnullableb_zLTM? Lower 95% confidence limit for zLTMstat.fit.paramfloatnullableB_zLTM? Upper 95% confidence limit for zLTMstat.fit.paramfloatnullablef_zLTM[u] Indicates zLTM is underconstrainedmeta.codecharzNFW[0.6/6.3]? Predicted PIEMDeNFW model redshiftstat.paramfloatnullableb_zNFW? Lower 95% confidence limit for zNFWstat.fit.paramfloatnullableB_zNFW? Upper 95% confidence limit for zNFWstat.fit.paramfloatnullablef_zNFW[u] Indicates zNFW is underconstrainedmeta.codecharComAdditional comments and/or references (4)meta.refcharJ/ApJ/801/44/clustersCLASH cluster sample properties from Postman et al., 2012, J/ApJS/199/25, tables 3 and 4SimbadNameSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.idcharOrbArchival ACS orbits unless flagged (5)meta.numbercharrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintSetCluster sample: X-ray or High magnification (1)meta.idcharNaNumber of arcs for this clustermeta.numberintnullableNameCluster namemeta.id;meta.maincharn_Name[op] individual remarks on Cluster (2)meta.notecharRAJ2000Hour of right ascension (J2000)pos.eq.ra;meta.mainDEJ2000Degree of declination (J2000)pos.eq.dec;meta.mainpos[a] position from optical image (3)meta.notecharz[0.18/0.9] Cluster redshiftsrc.redshiftfloatf_z[b] Redshift from X-ray spectrum (4)meta.codecharHST[18/20] HST cyclemeta.id;obsintCLASH[15/20] CLASH orbitsmeta.numberintPID[12065/12791] Program IDmeta.id;obsintf_Orb[w] WFPC2 image (5)meta.codecharIDInternal abbreviated cluster name as in table 2; column added by CDSmeta.idcharprimarykT[5.5/15.5] TemperaturekeVphys.temperaturefloate_kT[0.2/3] kT uncertaintykeVstat.error;phys.energyfloatLbol[6.7/91] Bolometric luminosity in 10^44^erg/s (6)1e+37Wphys.luminosityfloate_Lbol[0.1/3] Lbol uncertainty1e+37Wstat.errorfloatFe/H[0.1/0.6] Cluster to solar [Fe/H] ratio (7)log(Sun)phys.abund.Fe;arith.ratiofloate_Fe/H[0.06/0.3] Fe/H uncertaintylog(Sun)stat.error;phys.abund.Fefloatell[0/1]? Ellipticity {epsilon} (8)src.ellipticityfloatnullablee_ell[0.01/0.03]? ell uncertaintystat.errorfloatnullableshift[0.07/2.2]? Centroid shift (<w>(10^-2^R_500_)) (8)phys.atmol.lineShiftfloatnullablee_shift[0.01/0.2]? shift uncertaintystat.error;phys.atmol.lineShiftfloatnullableRefX-ray morphology reference(s) (9)meta.refcharNEDSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlchar