J/A+A/678/A170ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/A+A/678/A170doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.36780170CDSBlondin S.Dessart L.Hillier D.J.Ramsbottom C.A.Storey P.J.2024-11-28T20:05:25Z2023-10-18T07:52:58ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.fratomic-physicsexcitation-ratesastronomical-modelsstellar-atmospheresRecent JWST observations of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) 2021aefx in the nebular phase have paved the way for late-time studies covering the full optical to mid-infrared (MIR) wavelength range, and with it the hope to better constrain SN Ia explosion mechanisms. We investigate whether public SN Ia models covering a broad range of progenitor scenarios and explosion mechanisms (Chandrasekhar-mass, or MCh, delayed detonations, pulsationally assisted gravitationally-confined detonations, sub-MCh double detonations, and violent mergers) can reproduce the full optical-MIR spectrum of SN 2021aefx at ~270 days post explosion. Methods. We consider spherically-averaged 3D models available from the Heidelberg Supernova Model Archive with a ^56^Ni yield in the range 0.5-0.8M_{sun}_. We perform 1D steady-state non-local thermodynamic equilibrium simulations with the radiative-transfer code CMFGEN, and compare the predicted spectra to SN 2021aefx. The models can explain the main features of SN 2021aefx over the full wavelength range. However, no single model, or mechanism, emerges as a preferred match, and the predicted spectra are similar to one another despite the very different explosion mechanisms. We discuss possible causes for the mismatch of the models, including ejecta asymmetries and ionisation effects. Our new calculations of the collisional strengths for NiIII have a major impact on the two prominent lines at 7.35um and 11.00um, and highlight the need for more accurate collisional data for forbidden transitions. Using updated atomic data, we identify a strong feature due to [CaIV] 3.21um, attributed to [NiI] in previous studies. We also provide a tentative identification of a forbidden line due to [NeII] 12.81um, whose peaked profile suggests that neon is mixed inwards during the explosion, as predicted for instance in violent merger models. Contrary to previous claims, we show that the [ArIII] 8.99um line can be broader in sub-MCh models compared to near-MCh models. Last, the total flux in lines of Ni is found to correlate strongly with the stable nickel yield, although ionisation effects can bias the inferred abundance. Our models suggest that key physical ingredients are missing from either the explosion models, or the radiative-transfer post-processing, or both. Nonetheless, they also show the potential of the near- and mid-infrared to uncover new spectroscopic diagnostics of SN Ia explosion mechanisms.2023A&A...678A.170Bhttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/678/A170CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic servicerelated-toVI/148 : Collision Strengths for [Co II] Forbidden Lines - SS4J/A+A/475/765 : Fine structure forbidden lines in FeII (Ramsbottom+, 2007)https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/678/A170https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/678/A170http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/678/A170https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/678/A170https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/678/A170http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/678/A170GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapdefaultJ/A+A/678/A170/tablef1Level indexing for NiIII used in tablef2.datLevelLevel namemeta.id;phys.atmol.levelcharrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintIndex[1/43] Level indexmeta.idintJ/A+A/678/A170/tablef2Transition probabilities and collision strengthsrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintl[1/42] Lower level indexmeta.idintu[2/43] Upper level indexmeta.idintAulTransition probability (Einstein A value)s**-1phys.atmol.transProbdoubleups1.0e3Effective collision strength at T=1.0e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.5e3Effective collision strength at T=1.5e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.8e3Effective collision strength at T=1.8e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups2.0e3Effective collision strength at T=2.0e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups2.5e3Effective collision strength at T=2.5e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups5.0e3Effective collision strength at T=5.0e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups7.5e3Effective collision strength at T=7.5e+3Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.0e4Effective collision strength at T=1.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.5e4Effective collision strength at T=1.5e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.8e4Effective collision strength at T=1.8e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups2.0e4Effective collision strength at T=2.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups3.0e4Effective collision strength at T=3.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups4.0e4Effective collision strength at T=4.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups5.0e4Effective collision strength at T=5.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups6.0e4Effective collision strength at T=6.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups7.0e4Effective collision strength at T=7.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups8.0e4Effective collision strength at T=8.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups9.0e4Effective collision strength at T=9.0e+4Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdoubleups1.0e5Effective collision strength at T=1.0e+5Kphys.atmol.collStrengthdouble