J/A+A/661/A11ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/A+A/661/A11doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.36610011CDSChiu I.-N.Ghirardini V.Liu A.Grandis S.Bulbul E.Bahar Y.,Comparat J.Bocquet S.Clerc N.Klein M.Liu T.Li X.Miyatake H.,Mohr J.More S.Oguri M.Okabe N.Pacaud F.Ramos-ceja M.E.,Reiprich T.H.Schrabback T.Umetsu K.2024-10-21T20:01:29Z2022-09-28T13:25:48ZCDS support team

CDS, Observatoire de Strasbourg, 11 rue de l'Universite, F-67000 Strasbourg, France

cds-question@unistra.frgalaxy-clustersx-ray-sourcesWe present the first weak-lensing mass calibration and X-ray scaling relations of galaxy clusters and groups selected in the eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS) observed by Spectrum Roentgen Gamma/eROSITA over a contiguous footprint with an area of ~=140 deg^2^, using the three-year (S19A) weak-lensing data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program survey. In this work, we study a sample of 434 optically confirmed galaxy clusters (and groups) at redshift 0.01 <= z <= 1.3 with a median of 0.35, of which 313 systems are uniformly covered by the HSC survey to enable the extraction of the weak-lensing shear observable. In a Bayesian population modeling, we perform a blind analysis for the weak-lensing mass calibration by simultaneously modeling the observed count rate {eta} and the shear profile g_+_ of individual clusters through the count-rate-to-mass-and-redshift ({eta}-M_500_-z) relation and the weak-lensing-mass-to-mass-and-redshift (M_WL_-M_500_-z) relation, respectively, while accounting for the bias in these observables using simulation-based calibrations. As a result, the count-rate-inferred and lensing-calibrated cluster mass is obtained from the joint modeling of the scaling relations, as the ensemble mass spanning a range of 10^13^h^-1^M_{sun}_ <= M_500_ <= 10^15^h^-1^M_{sun}_ with a median of ~=10^14^h^-1^M_{sun}_ for the eFEDS sample. With the mass calibration, we further model the X-ray observable-to-mass-and-redshift relations, including the rest-frame soft-band and bolometric luminosity (L_X_ and L_b_), the emission-weighted temperature T_X_, the mass of intra-cluster medium M_g_, and the mass proxy Y_X_, which is the product of T_X_ and M_g_. Except for L_X_ with a steeper dependence on the cluster mass at a statistically significant level, we find that the other X-ray scaling relations all show a mass trend that is statistically consistent with the self-similar prediction at a level of <=1.7{sigma}. Meanwhile, all these scaling relations show no significant deviation from the self-similarity in their redshift scaling. Moreover, no significant redshift-dependent mass trend is present. This work demonstrates the synergy between the eROSITA and HSC surveys in preparation for the forthcoming first-year eROSITA cluster cosmology.2022A&A...661A..11Chttps://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/661/A11CatalogResearchIsServedByTAP VizieR generic serviceIsServedByConesearch servicerelated-toJ/A+A/661/A1 : The eFEDS X-ray catalogs (V7.4) (Brunner+, 2022)J/A+A/661/A2 : Galaxy clusters and groups in eFEDS (Liu+, 2022)https://cds.unistra.fr/vizier-org/licences_vizier.htmlhttps://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/661/A11https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/661/A11http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/VizieR-2?-source=J/A+A/661/A11https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/661/A11https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/661/A11http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/votable?-source=J/A+A/661/A11GETtext/xml+votablehttps://tapvizier.cds.unistra.fr/TAPVizieR/tapCone search capability for table J/A+A/661/A11/tablec1 (The estimates of the cluster true mass M500 of the eFEDS clusters)https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/conesearch/J/A+A/661/A11/tablec1?https://vizier.iucaa.in/viz-bin/conesearch/J/A+A/661/A11/tablec1?http://vizieridia.saao.ac.za/viz-bin/conesearch/J/A+A/661/A11/tablec1?GETtext/xml+votable180.050000true126.965625-0.48163030.0055555555555555564/1367 1707 5/1025-1029 1032 5459-5460 5462-5463 5465 6822 6827 6842 10239 6/4096-4098 4120-4122 4124 4134-4138 4160-4161 4224 21830-21831 21833 21844 21846-21847 21859 21869 21972-21973 27269 27271 27274-27275 27277-27280 27283 27286 27292 27294 27296-27298 27300 27302-27305 27307 27336 27338-27339 27360-27362 27364 27372 40951 40953-40955https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/moc/J/A+A/661/A11?format=asciiX-raydefaultJ/A+A/661/A11/tablec1The estimates of the cluster true mass M500 of the eFEDS clustersrecnoRecord number assigned by the VizieR team. Should Not be used for identification.meta.recordintNameeFEDS name (JHHMMSS.s+DDMMSS)meta.id;meta.maincharn_Name[*] * for clusters with 20.1<=f_cont_<0.3meta.notecharlogM500R0.2AMass M500 with the core in the weak-lensing mass calibration for R>0.2h^-1^Mpc (in h^1^M{sun} unit)log(solMass)phys.massfloatSimbadSimbad column added by the CDSmeta.ref.urlcharlogM500R0.2BMass M500 without the core in the weak-lensing mass calibration for R>0.2h^-1^Mpc (in h^1^M{sun} unit)log(solMass)phys.massfloate_logM500R0.2BError on logM500R-0.2Blog(solMass)stat.errorfloatlogM500R0.5AMass M500 with the core in the weak-lensing mass calibration for R>0.5h^-1^Mpc (in h^1^M{sun} unit)log(solMass)phys.massfloatlogM500R0.5BMass M500 without the core in the weak-lensing mass calibration for R>0.5h^-1^Mpc (in h^1^M{sun} unit)log(solMass)phys.massfloate_logM500R0.5BError on logM500R-0.5Blog(solMass)stat.errorfloatlogM500Rzsp? Mass M500 estimated with spectroscopic redshifts and without the core in the weak-lensing calibrationlog(solMass)phys.massfloatnullablee_logM500Rzsp? Error on logM500R-zsplog(solMass)stat.errorfloatnullable_RAPositions from eFEDS main catalog (Brunner et al., 2022, Cat. J/A+A/661/A1) (right ascension part)degpos.eq.ra;meta.main_DEPositions from eFEDS main catalog (Brunner et al., 2022, Cat. J/A+A/661/A1) (declination part)degpos.eq.dec;meta.main